Use of Popular Music in Cinema0 comments Saturday, January 15, 2011All elements indefinitely contribute to a scene in a cinema to convey a particular idea. Music is an element amongst those that plays a significant role to enhance the narrative, the emotional impact and the overall quality of the scene. Musics, just like stories for cinemas, are created originally for that film or may be adapted from a popular album/single. Even though such popular songs with lyrics are not part of the film score, they are a part of the soundtrack that includes dialogues and sound effects. A popular song well mixed into the soundtrack and well blended into the scene will really enhance the quality of the scene. In fact in my opinion, the use of popular songs makes the scene more realistic. The main intention behind the usage of popular music is that it has already been registered with viewer. The cinema goer would already have heard the song earlier in radio or television. Even though that is an advantage, this might turn up as a disadvantage as well if the song is not perfectly selected according to scene in the cinema. People would have created images and visuals themselves when they heard that song on the radio or television earlier and they would not like it if the reuse of the song does not fit into the situation. The use of popular songs in cinema dates back to the early 1930’s. William Wellman was a director who used popular songs in his movies. Martin Scorsese, the great realistic filmmaker, commented that at the end of the film ‘The Public enemy’ Wellman has played a record of a pleasant song expecting that his brother is arriving back. As the character opens the door he finds that his brother his dead and the pleasant song on the record keep on playing. This makes the scene more realistic. Scorsese is another director who loves to popular music in his films. His ‘Good Fellas’, one of the best films that tells you the highs, lows and emotions of gangsters, has got lots of sequences where popular music has been used. If am to prepare a list of such usages in cinema, I am pretty sure that half of the list would be from Goodfellas. The use of the guitar piece from the song ‘Sunshine of your love’ shows the authority of the character Jimmy in the film. Jimmy decides to kill all other people in the gang and the music goes in and Jimmy, played by Robert Di Nero starts smoking. The use of ‘Late for the sky’ in Taxi Driver fits inside the realism of the film and well connects with the theme of the movie as well. This shows the greatness of the director. The use of ‘This is the end’ in Apocalypse Now is one of the best among them. The lyric of the song sits well inside the theme of the film. It is very aptly used in the beginning of the film and in the final scene where Kurtz gets killed. The use of Peter Gabriel’s ‘In your eyes’ in ‘Say Anything’ is an example that sits well inside the scene and is mixed extremely realistically but does not go along fully with the theme of the movie. The list of such usages popular music in films would go on and on. Every realistic director would have used a popular song at least once in his any of his films to emboss the theme of the films and/or show the realism. My dad never had the habit of watching a lot of films, not at least till what i do now, but he used to encourage me watch more of realistic stuff. The influence of Globalisation on Indian film production industry0 comments Tuesday, January 11, 2011What is Globalisation? An Introduction Many economists believe that Globalisation has helped most of the developing countries industrially, financially and economically. It has had various after effects on those economies, both positive and negative. Similar to how it affected all other sectors it had affected the film production industry as well. Though international tourism contributes to cultural exchange, an effect of Globalisation, it is cinema that plays the most major role in altering the living styles of a society. The impact that cinema could bring about in any society is massive. A football world cup might be a bigger event than a cinema where people from all over meet and exchange cultures, but as cinema portrays the feelings, living style and culture of a society, the impact it has over other media is massively huge. Effects of Globalisation on film production industries The most important effect of Globalisation on film industries was that it enabled a bigger market for films worldwide. It was after the 1990’s that films started to get released worldwide. This increased the size of the film market and in result the revenue increased massively. The gross profit that Hollywood generated in the year 1997 was $30 billion, where Titanic alone contributing more $1.8 billion. (Technology in Indian culture and effects of Globalisation of Technology and media, no date) According to the IMDB (2010), the blockbuster film Avatar had collected $500 million by January 31st 2010, whereas its worldwide collection a week before had crossed $2billion. It was almost the same with Harry Potter and the Half-Blooded Prince. It grossed around $990 million worldwide and $301 million in U.S.A (IMDB, 2009). It can be observed from this that a worldwide release definitely increases the revenue by four to five times. According to Taylor (1995, p. 414), co-productions were initially perceived to enhance collaboration between countries with small production industries which would be able to pool resources and compete in an international market. The increase in the number of co-productions, an effect of Globalisation, was seen in the film production industry as well. This divide in budget naturally resulted in an increase of the same. Increase in budget helped the producers in that region to produce better films. Baltruschat (2002) believes that co-productions have the potential to hybridise cultures and their diversifications. Globalisation has really helped ‘Third cinema’ or ‘Third World Cinema’. (http://www.filmreference.com/encyclopedia/Romantic-Comedy-Yugoslavia/Third-Cinema.html, no date)The release of Latin American and Iranian films worldwide was a big support for them commercially. The London Iranian Film Festival and the London Latin-American Film Festivals are proof’s for that. Such film festivals prove that the love for such films in the developed world has increased a lot. Certain group of people raised another opinion that co-producers turn into dictators and therefore film-makers lose their freedom for expression. That group believes that globalisation has turned cinema into a commodity and cinema has started to lose its artistic value. Indian Film Industry Indian film industry is a leading Industry where films are produced in 24 languages. Most number of films is produced in Hindi, Telugu and Tamil. The first Indian feature film was produced in the year 1913. Indian film industry had worked just like the Hollywood until the 1960’s. Artists had worked on contractual basis for particular studio. It was after the 1900’s that artists started to work on a freelance basis. (http://www.indiaonestop.com/film.htm, no date) It is a fact that, India is the world’s largest producer of films. (Screen Australia, 2010) According to Screen Australia, India had produced 1288 films in 2009, which was around 24% of the films produced worldwide. The amount of films produced in India was almost the double than that production in the United Stated (677 films in 2009, which is around 12% of the world share). Whereas the cost of production of films in India is much lower than many other developed countries. When developed countries produce films for billions of dollars, India does it in millions. According to Screen Australia (2010) the total production cost of Indian films in 2010 was just $195 million, whereas that in U.S.A was $13,289 million. Effects of globalisation on the Indian film production Industry. Formation of international joint- ventured production houses was one of the main effects of Globalisation. Mostly the ventures were between Hollywood an Indian production houses. ‘Studio 18’ is an example for that It is a joint venture between ‘Viacom’ a U.S. based communication company and ‘Network 18’, an India based media conglomerate. Studio18 has produced a total of 15 films and have released it worldwide. Another effect of globalisation was the absorption of small Indian studios by large International production houses. This has acted both in positive ways and negative. The positive factor is that many artists get to work with an international company. But, unfortunately the negative side is that that is not what happens most of the time. An example of such absorption was the Sony Pictures taking over the Chennai based animation studio ‘Imageworks’. It was definitely for the good of the company because later it had largely contributed to films like Spiderman 3 and I am Legend. In the recent years a lot of international producers have put in money directly into single films. Sony Pictures in 2007 associated with Sanjay Leela Bhansali, directly entered into the market producing a Hindi film named Saawariya. Though Saawariya was not a commercial success in India, the film grossed $805,054 in U.S.A alone (I.M.D.B, 2007). Later in 2009 Warner Brothers produced a film associating with Ramesh Sippy Entertainment named Chandini Chowk to China. The film grossed around $1 million from U.S.A alone (I.M.D.B, 2009). Exchange of talent Globalisation has helped the film production companies to share the international pool of talent. The rate of usage of international talent increased tremendously after the 1990’s. Later, many artists from international cinema have worked for Indian cinema and vice versa. Some of the international artists who worked for Indian film are: Danny Pierce: Stunt coordinator Danny Pierce (films like: The Pirates of the Caribbean) had recently worked for an Indian film ‘Kites’. Snoop Dog: Hip-hop artist Snoop Dog had worked on the sound track of a Hindi film named Singh is King. The film is considered to be a hit in the U.K. A studio that recently worked for an Indian film was the Stan Winston Studios for Enthiran. They had worked on the animatronics. According to Indo Asian News service (2010), Enthiran is the most expensively produced film among Indian films. The film which spent around $38 million was produced in two different languages, Hindi and Tamil. Some of the Indian artists who worked for international films: A.R.Rahman who composed and produced music for the film Slumdog Millionaire and Resul Pookutty who mixed the sound for the As described in their Credo Ramoji believes that film-makers can, “walk in with a script and walk out with a canned film.”(Ramoji Film City, no date) Future “Steven Spielberg in Indian deal as LA moguls fall for Bollywood charms” This was title of an article in Sunday times. Blakely (2008) reports that Anil Ambani of the Reliance BIG Pictures had invested $550 million into Steven Spielbergs Dreamworks productions. Dreamworks is an independent company which is separated from Paramount and Reliance has nearly taken half of its shares. Dreamworks will now be working on 5-6 films every year (Wells, 2009) Conclusion When taking an analysis of the Indian film Production industry from 1990 to 2010, the following can be observed.
So, just as like how globalisation has helped in the development of any other sector of a developing country, it has helped the Indian Film Production Industry as well. The Indian control over the international film arena has started to increase. India has had no restriction in the number of foreign releases, unlike China, which restricts foreign films to an amount of 20. This had made a slight impact last year. The number of international releases had gone up in India. But still, India continued to be the largest producer Films. We shall expect India to produce a larger amount of films for the international audience in the coming years. Muybridge: The Father of Motion Pictures0 comments Friday, January 7, 2011Thomas Edison the great inventor who holds 1093 patents to his name is said to have received the idea for the Kinetoscope from an English photographer who went to meet him asking to incorporate Edison’s phonograph with his motion capturing device, which if worked would have been the first projector with video and audio. Later after five years, Edison’s Kinetoscope along with his phonograph recorded a scene for the first time in the history to be projected. That English photographer was who used multiple cameras and another device which created to project movement of animals was Eadweard J. Muybridge. Tate Britain had conducted an exhibition during September 2010 and January 2011 showcasing Muybridge’s works. Muybridge, the man who proved that a horse can fly (Tate Britain, 2010) is widely considered to be the Father of motion pictures. In 1872, Muybridge was hired by a race horse owner to prove scientifically that all four legs of a running horse would be in the air at some certain point of time. People did not believe this until Muybridge captured the running motion of a horse using a series of cameras and played it back to them. He arranged 24 cameras using glass plate and were separated by 27 inches and were placed just next to the race track. He arranged the cameras to trigger as the horse passed by each camera using a string. All the pictures when continuously played back created an illusion of moving horse and it proved that all four legs will stay on air at some certain point of time. Even though there many splendid works including ‘study of wrestlers’ and ‘movement of a horse’ were portrayed in the Tate Britain exhibition, the highlights were the panoramic photograph of San Francisco and a working Zoopraxiscope. Zoopraxiscope is a device that Muybridge invented that would create an illusion of motion when images were printed on glass disk and are manually rotated. The panoramic photograph of San Francisco is 17 feet long. He took approximately five and half hours to shoot the picture. Riggins (2008) writes that Muybridge shot picture from a place that was 381 feet above the ground from where he was able to get the full view of the city. The picture gives an idea of how San Francisco was before the 1906 earthquake. The personal life of Muybridge was much unknown to the world. I was not aware that Muybridge was conducted for the murder of his wife’s lover until i visited the exhibition at Tate Britain. Muybridge’s wife named Flora was only half his age. She had a relation with an army man whenever Muybridge was not at home. According to ‘The Virtual Victorian’(2010) when Muybridge came to know about the relation, he went straight to the lover and said: "Good evening, Major, my name is Muybridge and here is the answer to the letter you sent my wife" and fired a bullet at him. Later, when Flora gave birth to baby boy, ‘the father of motion pictures’ denied the fatherhood of that child. The exhibition has revealed the unveiled about Eadweard Muybridge.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
Nikhil VarmaSound Design - Voice Over - Greater Kochi - Film Buff - Cricket - Travel - Not a strict ideologist.
Sound Design Weekly
This is a weekly automatically created by paper.li taking stories from various sound designers, musicians, audio companies etc Labels
|

